Patrick Dangerfield scored a meagre 63 Supercoach points against the Bombers |
If you are worried about some of your Supercoach selections
after the weekend you’re probably not alone. Take solace in the fact that many
coaches have Patrick Dangerfield, Brendon Goddard, and Dyson Heppell in their
teams. It’s always easy in hindsight to rue the decisions you’ve made. ‘Why did
I pick Dangerfield over Watson’ or ‘I should have gone with Mundy over Fyfe’.
If these words ring true for you remind yourself that you picked these players
for a reason and now’s not the time to jump off the bandwagon. Back your judgement, keep calm and don’t push
the trade but just yet.
Over the past weekend there were some very ordinary
performances. Many of our Supercoach stars were well down on their expected
outputs and Patrick Dangerfield was one of the biggest. After a massive year in
2012, Dangerfield had shown signs he would become one of the premier
midfielders in the competition. He started on fire against the Bombers on
Friday night until they sent Heath Hocking to quell his influence. It worked
and Dangerfield finished with a meagre 63 Supercoach points for the game. Then
there’s the rising stars Dyson Heppell and Luke Shuey. Shuey was another victim
of the tag, scoring only 56 Supercoach points after he was blanketed by Ryan
Crowley for the entire game. Heppell like Dangerfield started well in the
midfield, as expected, only to slow down in the second half to finish with 73
Supercoach points. All were well down on their projected scores. Others like Patrick
Ryder (54 SC points), Paul Duffield (80 SC points) and Brendon Goddard (86 SC
points) failed to produce. Even Nat Fyfe’s 96 points seemed disappointing if
you chose him ahead of David Mundy (126 SC points) and Michael Barlow (144 SC
points).
So what do we do now? Do we react to these disappointing
scores and trade out our under-performing stars? That sounds like an easy
solution. Trade out Dangerfield and bring in Watson. But what if Dangerfield
comes out and scores 150 Supercoach points against the Lions next round? It
wouldn’t be the first time a star like Dangerfield responded like this. In fact
it happens quite a lot. The Crows also have an easier draw playing teams like
the Western Bulldogs, Port Adelaide and Gold Coast early. Although sides will
try and tag Dangerfield each week they won’t have the same success that Hocking
did on Friday night. The better solution is to keep Dangerfield and see how he
plays next week. If he scores another 60 points then maybe consider a trade if
he’s going to drop in price dramatically. Last year’s winner did this after
round 2 when he traded Montagna out for Sam Mitchell. A bold move that paid off
in the end, but initially it looked like it would backfire when Mitchell scored
an 83 and a 55 in two of his next three games. I suppose this is the type of
move that enabled him to win the overall competition. However, the norm is if
you pick a premium it’s best to stick with them as they usually come good given
time. It also saves a trade which comes in handy down the track.
This same line of thought goes for the other stars as
well. Stick with Goddard, Heppell, and Ryder for now. Although it could be
tempting with 30 trades this year, see how they respond next round before
pulling the trigger and trading them out. Otherwise it’s likely to leave you
with egg on your face. If they perform badly again then it gets a bit more
complicated. It comes down to who the player is firstly, their scoring history
in past years, and a judgement call by you. For example if Luke Shuey had
another bad game I would consider trading him out. Shuey isn’t yet a proven
star who has delivered premium scores consistently, although we were hoping for
this to happen after a breakout season in 2012. Therefore it would make sense
to jump off Shuey at $553K and jump on a Barlow ($509K) or Mundy ($477K) who
are both cheaper options that look like delivering premium numbers this year.
On the other hand I wouldn’t consider trading out Goddard. He is an elite
Supercoach performer who has consistently delivered premium numbers. Goddard
also had limited touches for his 86 Supercoach points. He’s a damaging player
and when he gets more touches (which he will) his scoring output will increase
dramatically.
Another mistake would be to make wholesale changes to
your side this week in reaction to some of your selections not paying off.
Although it’s possible it could work, it’s more likely to backfire. The players
you change are likely to have big games as you initially thought. Besides some
slight tweaking, trust your original judgements and stick with the players
you’ve chosen.
When it comes to making trades after round 1 the only trades
I would consider are forced trades due to injured players. Mark LeCras is a
perfect example. He was just starting to look dangerous when he broke his arm
and is now out for 4 weeks. A possible trade for LeCras would be his teammate
Josh Kennedy. Kennedy was impressive in his return on the weekend kicking 2
goals on his way to 109 SC points. At $299K he would also give you another $69K in the
bank to use elsewhere. Even so I would wait until round one is completed so you
have a better idea of how everyone performs as you never know what can happen
in the game of Supercoach.
Ideally, I believe the best outcome is not to trade until
the end of round two. One game doesn’t make a season and from experience this
is especially true in Supercoach. Last year’s winner was ranked in the 60,000’s
after the first two rounds yet went on to win as a result of making the right trades
at the right time. Now is not the right time. Keep calm and don’t trade...not yet
anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment